Making the Diagnosis in Sagittal Craniosynostosis—It’s Height, Not Length, That Matters

15Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: This study assesses the diagnostic reliability of a novel photogrammetric measurement to distinguish sagittal craniosynostosis (SS) from control and false positive cases (SNS). Methods: Head CTs from 2014–2020 were reviewed for patients with sagittal synostosis (SS, n = 177), presumed sagittal synostosis with normal imaging (SNS, n = 30), and controls (n = 100). Using preoperative clinical photographs and CTs, a measurement reflecting the anterior–posterior location of the vertex was measured using an angle drawn between the cranial vertex, nasion, and opisthocranion (VNO) in profile view, with the head in a neutral position. Results: Mean age at pre-operative head CT was 9.5 months for the SS cohort, 4.2 months for the SNS cohort, and 8.9 months for controls (p =.327). Mean age at pre-operative clinical photograph was 9.5 months for the SS cohort and 4.2 months for the SNS cohort (p =.149). Pearson correlations revealed no significant association between age and VNO angle. The average VNO angle measured on clinical photographs was 54.7° ± 3.8° for the SS group, 43.1° ± 2.2° for the SNS group, and 41.1° ± 3.7° for controls (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blum, J. D., Cho, D. Y., Cheung, L., Villavisanis, D. F., Ng, J., Swanson, J. W., … Taylor, J. A. (2022). Making the Diagnosis in Sagittal Craniosynostosis—It’s Height, Not Length, That Matters. Child’s Nervous System, 38(7), 1331–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05518-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free