Abstract
This paper describes two methods designed to study and diagnose innovation processes. The first one adopts a systems perspective and focuses on information flows and decision-making during a project, whereas the second one privileges a cognitive approach and is aimed at highlighting actors' representations of innovation processes and new products. A comparison of the research results obtained in different industrial firms using these two methods introduces a discussion of the complementarity of both perspectives. These observations lead to an assessment of the collective learning mechanisms initiated during the field studies.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Chanal, V. (1999). Methods for studying innovation processes: Towards a complementarity between organizational and cognitive perspectives. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 13(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1051/ejess:1999102
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.