When Legal Representation is Deficient: The Challenge of Immigration Cases for the Courts

7Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When the quality of lawyering is inadequate, courts are frustrated in their adjudicative role. Nowhere is this more apparent than in cases involving immigrants hoping to fend off deportation. As an appellate judge on a court whose immigration docket reached 40 percent of our caseload, I have too often seen deficient legal representation of immigrants. Although courts are reactive, resolving cases before them, judges can systematically promote the fair and effective administration of justice. With the aid of some outstanding legal talent, I created the Study Group on Immigrant Representation to help address the immigrant representation crisis. Our work has encompassed a variety of activities, including: publishing symposia; conducting studies documenting the enormity of the problem and proposing solutions; creating initiatives to expand pro bono representation; facilitating the 1/2rst local government funding of direct immigrant legal services; creating legal orientation programs for immigrants; and developing the Immigrant Justice Corps, an innovative fellowship program. These initiatives represent some steps towards easing the crisis in immigrant legal representation. © 2014 by Robert A. Katzmann.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katzmann, R. A. (2014). When Legal Representation is Deficient: The Challenge of Immigration Cases for the Courts. Daedalus, 143(3), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00286

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free