The NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant does not alter the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma

23Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

AIMS: The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan used as conditioning therapy before blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. METHODS: Aprepitant (125 mg) or placebo was administered 1 h before melphalan therapy (1 h infusion of 100 mg m-2). Eleven plasma samples were obtained over 8 h and melphalan was quantified using an LC/MS/MS method. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and nonparametric testing was applied to assess the differences between aprepitant and placebo treatment. RESULTS: Twenty patients received placebo and 10 patients aprepitant treatment. There were no differences observed for Cmax at the end of melphalan infusion (placebo 3431 ± 608 ng ml-1vs. aprepitant 3269 ± 660 ng ml-1). In addition, AUC and terminal elimination half-life were not changed by aprepitant. Total clearance of melphalan was 304 ± 58 ml min-1 m-2 (placebo) which was not influenced by aprepitant (288 ± 78 ml min-1 m-2). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of the NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant 1 h before a high-dose chemotherapy does not influence the exposure and the elimination of melphalan. Therefore, oral administration of 125 mg aprepitant 1 h before melphalan infusion does not alter the disposition of intravenously administered melphalan. © 2010 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2010 The British Pharmacological Society.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Egerer, G., Eisenlohr, K., Gronkowski, M., Burhenne, J., Riedel, K. D., & Mikus, G. (2010). The NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant does not alter the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 70(6), 903–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03792.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free