Case for change: A standardised inpatient paediatric early warning system in England

27Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most children in hospital who are clinically deteriorating are monitored regularly, and their treatment is escalated effectively. However a small, but significant, number of deteriorating children experience suboptimal outcomes because of a failure to recognise and respond to acute deterioration early enough leading to unintended harm. Tragically this occasionally can have fatal consequences. Investigations into these rare events highlight common themes of missed early signs of deterioration in children, prompting regulatory agencies to suggest paediatric early warning systems (PEWS) to aid clinical practice. In England, track and trigger tools (TTT), which are one facet of PEWS have been widely rolled out but in a heterogeneous fashion. The evidence for TTT is mixed but they are complex interventions and current outcomes do not fully define the entirety of their potential impact. This article explains the rationale behind the decision of the NHS England and NHS Improvement, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and Royal College of Nursing to implement a standardised inpatient PEWS as part of a system-wide paediatric observations tracking system in England and how this fits into a wider programme of activity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roland, D., Stilwell, P. A., Fortune, P. M., Alexander, J., Clark, S. J., & Kenny, S. (2021, July 1). Case for change: A standardised inpatient paediatric early warning system in England. Archives of Disease in Childhood. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-320466

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free