A theory-informed approach to identify barriers to utilising Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in practice: from vicious cycles to sustainable solutions

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a vital tool for diagnosis of life-threatening conditions, with broad consensus supporting its integration into medical curricula. Despite evidence of effectiveness of POCUS training, many clinicians do not utilise skills in practice, resulting in missed patient benefits. Research on the barriers to POCUS utilisation remains limited. To address this, we conducted a theory-informed exploratory qualitative case study to investigate the utilisation of Focused Intensive Care Echo (FICE) in a specialist heart and lung hospital. The investigation was framed using situated learning and activity theory. We undertook 28 interviews, three focus groups (N = 27) and two expert discussions. Thematic analysis identified barriers while difference-within-similarity-analysis (Hofmann, 2020) uncovered how these interact to hinder POCUS-utilisation. We demonstrate how barriers preventing trainees from using POCUS interacted with the wider activity system, forming vicious cycles to further hinder use. These vicious cycles related to enthusiasm, opportunity, support, participation, communication and norms that hindered POCUS-use, and manifest as an underlying tension between competing priorities of POCUS training and patient care. We discuss how theoretically re-framing the findings suggests low/medium-resource mechanisms which helped mitigate this tension and overcome the vicious cycles. These facilitative mechanisms could generate scalable and sustainable solutions to support POCUS-training and utilisation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hofmann, R., Blaskova, L. J., & Jones, N. (2026). A theory-informed approach to identify barriers to utilising Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in practice: from vicious cycles to sustainable solutions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 31(2), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10447-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free