Rookie mistakes: Preemptive comments on graduate student empirical research manuscripts

1Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Political science graduate students need to develop strong skills in drafting empirical research manuscripts. Yet, many graduate student manuscripts contain similar shortcomings, which require student peers, faculty advisors, and journal referees to produce the same comments for multiple manuscripts. This article lists common comments on empirical research manuscripts, as a reference to help students revise their manuscripts before presentation to others for review, so that reviewers can focus on the more substantive elements of a manuscript, thus producing better manuscripts that are more likely to be published and thus contribute to knowledge about political phenomena. © 2013 American Political Science Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zigerell, L. J. (2013). Rookie mistakes: Preemptive comments on graduate student empirical research manuscripts. PS - Political Science and Politics, 46(1), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651200131X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free