Neither thermosonication nor cold sonication is better than pasteurization for milk shelf life

30Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

High-power, low-frequency ultrasound has been suggested as a novel processing technique with the potential to extend milk shelf life via inactivation of bacteria and spores that survive standard pasteurization. The primary objective of this research was to determine whether short-duration (≤60 s) sonication treatment, in conjunction with pasteurization, can increase shelf life while producing no adverse aroma effect. Skim milk was inoculated with Paenibacillus amylolyticus, a spore-forming, thermotolerant and psychrophilic milk contamination bacterium. Milk was sonicated under 6 selected amplitude and time conditions, except for control. Both cold sonicated (C-S) and thermosonicated (T-S) milk and milk treatments were pasteurized; however, T-S milk was sonicated after pasteurization (72.5 ± 0.3°C; mean ± SD), whereas C-S milk was sonicated at 12.5 ± 5°C (mean ± SD) before pasteurization. Milk was refrigerated up to 50 d and total aerobic counts were enumerated on pasteurized control, C-S, and T-S milk weekly. Neither C-S nor T-S treatments reduced total aerobic counts to an equivalent level as pasteurization alone. Counts in pasteurized controls and C-S milk did not exceed 3.00 log cfu/mL for up to 50 d; counts in T-S milk exceeded 5.00 cfu/mL by d 36. Aroma qualities (cooked, lacks freshness, and rubbery) of 2 T-S treatment intensities [170 µm peak-to-peak (p-p) for 60s and 200 µm p-p for 10 s] and pasteurized controls were evaluated by a trained descriptive sensory panel. No significant differences were observed in cooked or lacks freshness aromas among samples. Only the milk treated with 170 µm p-p for 60 s had significantly higher rubbery aroma on d 1 compared with milk treated with 200 µm p-p for 10 s. Although the sensory effects of T-S on milk may not limit the commercial feasibility of cold sonication or thermosonication, conditions that differ from those used in the present study should be considered in the future. Neither C-S nor T-S were appropriate techniques for reducing bacterial count in fluid milk beyond standard pasteurization and, in fact, increased counts of spore-forming spoilage bacteria.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lim, S. Y., Benner, L. C., & Clark, S. (2019). Neither thermosonication nor cold sonication is better than pasteurization for milk shelf life. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(5), 3965–3977. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15347

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free