Abstract
This paper examines the validity of some stylized statements that can be found in the actuarial literature about random effects models. Specifically, the actual meaning of the estimated parameters and the nature of the residual heterogeneity are discussed. A numerical illustration performed on a Belgian motor third party liability portfolio supports this discussion.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Boucher, J.-P., & Denuit, M. (2006). Fixed versus Random Effects in Poisson Regression Models for Claim Counts: A Case Study with Motor Insurance. ASTIN Bulletin, 36(1), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0515036100014495
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free