Fixed versus Random Effects in Poisson Regression Models for Claim Counts: A Case Study with Motor Insurance

  • Boucher J
  • Denuit M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper examines the validity of some stylized statements that can be found in the actuarial literature about random effects models. Specifically, the actual meaning of the estimated parameters and the nature of the residual heterogeneity are discussed. A numerical illustration performed on a Belgian motor third party liability portfolio supports this discussion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boucher, J.-P., & Denuit, M. (2006). Fixed versus Random Effects in Poisson Regression Models for Claim Counts: A Case Study with Motor Insurance. ASTIN Bulletin, 36(1), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0515036100014495

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free