The UK vs Sweden: Is the NHS really so bad?

  • Lazaridis E
  • Gavalova L
  • Jones S
  • et al.
ISSN: 2167-9843
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sheng-Chia Chung and colleagues report in The Lancet (23 January 2014) an international comparison of cardiovascular patient mortality between the UK and Sweden. They suggest that “more than 10000 deaths at 30 days would have been prevented or delayed had UK patients experienced the care of their Swedish counterparts.” Further, they estimate that 1741 deaths would have been prevented in the UK had the Swedish pattern of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and beta-blocker use been replicated in the NHS from 2004 to 2010. However, their study does not provide convincing evidence that faster uptake of primary PCI or beta-blockers on discharge would have had an effect on cardiovascular patient mortality in the UK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lazaridis, E. N., Gavalova, L., Jones, S., Quinn, T., & Weston, C. (2014). The UK vs Sweden: Is the NHS really so bad? PeerJ PrePrints, 2, e253v1. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.253v1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free