Evaluation of Risk-Assessment Tools for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

92Citations
Citations of this article
135Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine and compare the validity of three known risk-assessment tools (CMQCC [California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative], AWHONN [Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses], and NYSBOH [New York Safety Bundle for Obstetric Hemorrhage]) in women undergoing cesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that evaluated all women undergoing cesarean delivery at 23 weeks of gestation or longer from 2012 to 2017 at an urban hospital with average of 1,200 cesarean deliveries per year. Data were obtained by chart review. Severe postpartum hemorrhage was defined as transfusion of at least four units of packed red blood cells during the intrapartum or postpartum period. For each risk-assessment tool, women were stratified into low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk groups. Risk factors were examined using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 6,301 women who underwent cesarean delivery, a total of 76 (1.2%) had severe postpartum hemorrhage. Women classified as low- or medium-risk had lower rates of severe postpartum hemorrhage (0.4-0.6%) compared with women classified as high-risk (1.8-5.1%) (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kawakita, T., Mokhtari, N., Huang, J. C., & Landy, H. J. (2019). Evaluation of Risk-Assessment Tools for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 134(6), 1308–1316. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003574

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free