Characterization and non-clinical assessment of the proposed etanercept biosimilar GP2015 with originator etanercept (Enbrel®)

27Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and objective: Biosimilars are approved biologics that are comparable to an originator product with respect to quality, safety and efficacy. Herein, the authors describe the functional and non-clinical studies designed to determine the biosimilarity of GP2015 and originator etanercept (Enbrel®). Methods: The development of an Enbrel biosimilar (GP2015) involved extensive characterization of the originator. A step-wise target-directed and iterative technical development program involving state-of-the-art functional characterization studies and non-clinical evaluations (pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety/toxicology) was applied with the aim of confirming that GP2015 is comparable to originator (Enbrel) at the non-clinical level. Results: In in vitro tests, GP2015 and Enbrel had comparable binding affinities to TNF-α, C1q complement and a complete panel of Fc-Receptors. Comprehensive functional characterization testing confirmed the comparability of GP2015 with Enbrel in terms of its ability to bind to and neutralize TNF-α, which reflects the primary mechanism of action of etanercept. Non-clinical data confirmed that the proposed biosimilar to Enbrel, GP2015, is comparable with regards to its pharmacokinetic properties and pharmacodynamic activity, and efficacy as well as safety/toxicity. Conclusion: The proposed Enbrel biosimilar, GP2015, was shown to be comparable to its originator product in studies designed to confirm biosimilarity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hofmann, H. P., Kronthaler, U., Fritsch, C., Grau, R., Müller, S. O., Mayer, R., … Da Silva, A. (2016). Characterization and non-clinical assessment of the proposed etanercept biosimilar GP2015 with originator etanercept (Enbrel®). Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 16(10), 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2016.1217329

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free