The Architecture of Strategic Choice: From Strong Leaders to Strong Strategies

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How should the agenda set by the Strategic Defence and Security Review be implemented? The traditional answer would be committed leadership and strong investment. Design theory, however, offers a different perspective on UK strategy which is focused more on institutional capacity for action and the identification of long-term goals than on the prime minister's decision-making. Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen argues that strong strategies are based on a cogent response and a coherent narrative that enables the UK government to achieve full-spectrum effect. Such an effort should especially focus on using the capabilities of allies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rasmussen, M. V. (2015). The Architecture of Strategic Choice: From Strong Leaders to Strong Strategies. RUSI Journal, 160(6), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2015.1127553

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free