Monocular Clues in Seven Stereotests

  • Hahn E
  • Comstock D
  • Durling S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: There have been numerous reports with evidence detailing the presence of non-stereoscopic or “monocular”clues in commonly used stereoacuity tests. The purpose of this study was to quantify the influence of monocularclues in the Titmus, Randot®, Randot® Special Edition, Randot® Preschool, Lang, Lang II, and Frisby stereoacuitytests. Stereoacuity testing is typically performed and/or interpreted by eye care professionals and other health/occupational professionals. Methods: Two separate prospective studies were conducted. The first assessed the monocular responses of 100subjects aged 8 to 67 with normal stereoacuity, and no previous exposure to any of the seven tests administered.The second assessed the monocular responses of 33 subjects aged 8 to 65 with longstanding, manifest, horizontalstrabismus of 20 prism diopters or greater, on the aforementioned stereotests. Results: Monocular clues were found to be present for the normal group on the Titmus (61%), Randot® (6%), Randot®Special Edition (5%), Randot® Preschool (7%), Lang (13%), and Lang II (37%). Monocular clues were found to be presentfor the strabismic group on the Titmus (100%), Randot® (9%), Randot® Special Edition (9%), Randot® Preschool (12%),Lang (3%), and Lang II (27%). There was no monocular identification for either group on the Frisby stereotest, butthere was minimal binocular identification by a subject with manifest strabismus. Conclusion: Monocular clues were present for both the normal and strabismic group on 6 of the 7 stereotestsinvestigated. Based on these findings the authors conclude that caution must be used when interpreting patientresponses on the 7 aforementioned stereotests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hahn, E., Comstock, D., Durling, S., MacCarron, J., Mulla, S., James, P., & LaRoche, R. (2010). Monocular Clues in Seven Stereotests. Dalhousie Medical Journal, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol37no1.3861

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free