Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening strategies for cervical cancer in Tunisia

1Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We aimed to identify the most appropriate screening strategy for cervical cancer (periodicity of 3, 5 or 10 years) for Tunisia, taking into consideration the incidence of the disease, costs of screening and economic implications. We simulated follow-up of a fictitious cohort of 1 million women 35-39 years over 30 years. Computation of yearly medical care costs was based on data from medical files of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2004 at the National Institute of Cancer, Tunis. For a 60% coverage level of screening, cervical cancer reduction would be 49.2% for a 3-year periodicity. The reduction would be 40.3% and 33.1% for 5 and 10 years periodicity respectively. Considering cost-effectiveness, 10-year screening gave the lowest annual cost to avoid 1 cervical cancer case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lazaar, H. B. G., Aounallah-Skhiri, H., Oueslati, F., Frikha, H., Achour, N., & Hsairi, M. (2010). Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening strategies for cervical cancer in Tunisia. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 16(6), 460–466. https://doi.org/10.26719/2010.16.6.602

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free