Benchmarking genetic diversity in a third-generation breeding population of Melaleuca alternifolia

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The success of a long-term breeding program for outcrossing tree species depends not only on genetic gains through selection but also on the maintenance of genetic diversity over consecutive generations of plant breeding. To inform future breeding and deployment of Melaleuca alternifolia, this study benchmarked genetic variation in 114 selected individuals from a third-generation breeding population with 18 microsatellite markers. Five loci were used to compare diversity measures in the breeding population to values of genetic variation for natural populations in Australia. The expected heterozygosity in the breeding population was high (HE = 0.823) and comparable to the average heterozygosity for 427 individuals from 36 natural populations (HE = 0.844). The inbreeding coefficient FIS was 0.044 and 0.151 in breeding and natural populations, respectively. These favourable findings confirmed that objectives of past breeding practices were successful in maintaining diversity and preventing inbreeding. Sample size effects were evident, nonetheless, and the average number of alleles per locus (NA) was markedly reduced, especially those of low frequency. To study the impact deploying clones would have on genetic diversity, simulated populations of clones were created by repeatedly sampling the breeding population for subsets of 10, 15 or 20 individuals and generating diversity parameters for all 18 loci. Results for each number of individuals were compared to the diversity in the entire breeding population. Sample size had no effect on HE, but NA was significantly and progressively reduced with smaller sample size.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Voelker, J., & Shepherd, M. (2020). Benchmarking genetic diversity in a third-generation breeding population of Melaleuca alternifolia. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-020-1416-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free