Are survival estimates and models obtained by capture-recapture correct? A triple analysis of data with known dates of death

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We use data from a survey of women with metastatic breast cancer coming more or less regularly for check-ups as a real-size test of capture-recapture methodology and models. Unlike capture-recapture data of animals, the date of death of each individual is exactly known. The individuals were separated into four groups; the study lasted for 10 years separated into 32 visit occasions (one every fourth month). We analysed the data three times: once with standard survival analysis with known date of death (discrete-time proportional hazards models); once with capture-recapture models after removing the date of death (using 'live recapture' records); and once with 'return rates' corrected by later encounters of the individuals ('minimum number alive' estimates). Comparing the results obtained from the three methods confirms the efficiency of capture-recapture analysis. © 1999 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Viallefont, A., Kanyamibwa, S., & Asselain, B. (1999). Are survival estimates and models obtained by capture-recapture correct? A triple analysis of data with known dates of death. Bird Study, 46, S253–S260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659909477252

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free