Procalcitonin Is Not a Reliable Biomarker of Bacterial Coinfection in People with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Undergoing Microbiological Investigation at the Time of Hospital Admission

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Admission procalcitonin measurements and microbiology results were available for 1040 hospitalized adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (from 48 902 included in the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium World Health Organization Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK study). Although procalcitonin was higher in bacterial coinfection, this was neither clinically significant (median [IQR], 0.33 [0.11-1.70] ng/mL vs 0.24 [0.10-0.90] ng/mL) nor diagnostically useful (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.56 [95% confidence interval,. 51-.60]).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Relph, K. A., Russell, C. D., Fairfield, C. J., Turtle, L., De Silva, T. I., Siggins, M. K., … Ho, A. (2022). Procalcitonin Is Not a Reliable Biomarker of Bacterial Coinfection in People with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Undergoing Microbiological Investigation at the Time of Hospital Admission. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free