The Virtual as the Digital

16Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I reply to seven commentaries on "The Virtual and the Real". In response to Claus Beisbart, Jesper Juul, Peter Ludlow, and Neil McDonnell and Nathan Wildman, I clarify and develop my view that virtual are digital objects, with special attention to the nature of digital objects and data structures. In response to Alyssa Ney and Eric Schwitzgebel, I clarify and defend my spatial functionalism, with special attention to the connections between space and consciousness. In response to Marc Silcox, I clarify and develop my view of the value of virtual worlds, with special attention to the case where we experience these worlds as virtual.

References Powered by Scopus

Does a rock implement every finite-state automaton?

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What Not to Multiply Without Necessity

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The virtual and the real

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Augmented Reality, Augmented Epistemology, and the Real-World Web

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Weirdness of the World

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The philosophy of the metaverse

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chalmers, D. J. (2019). The Virtual as the Digital. Disputatio, 11(55), 453–486. https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0022

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 6

55%

Computer Science 2

18%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Neuroscience 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free