EFFICACY OF THREE DIFFERENT RETREATMENT FILE SYSTEMS FOR GUTTA-PERCHA REMOVAL USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

  • Aly A
  • Abdallah A
  • El Backly R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The maximum ability of retreatment files to remove defective obturation materials is very important during endodontic retreatment. AIM OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of three different retreatment systems in root canal filling removal using chloroform as solvent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty six extracted single rooted mandibular human premolars were used in this study following appropriate institutional ethical consent. Teeth were accessed and prepared chemo-mechanically to a standard working length of 17mm using Revo-S files. Obturation was done with lateral condensation using Total Fill bioceramic sealer and gutta percha. Teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=12) according to retreatment files used: ProTaper-D group, R-ENDO group and M-Two-R group using Chloroform as solvent. Specimens were labeled then preoperative and postoperative CBCT scans were conducted and volume of remaining obturation material was measured by Osirix 32-bits software to be compared. Data were collected and statistical analysis was done where P value was set as P< 0.05. RESULTS: All systems significantly removed gutta percha. However, none of the used files completely removed the root canal filling material from the canals. The Protaper D group left significantly more root canal filling material than the M-Two R and R-Endo groups (P <0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the M-Two R and R-Endo groups (Wilcoxon test used, P<0.05). ProTaper D left more remnants in the coronal third (18.48%) showing statistically significant difference with the other groups. No Statistically significant differences were found at the middle or apical thirds between all groups (Friedman, Kruskal-Wallis tests used, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The R-Endo and M-two R were more effective in removing root canal filling material than the ProTaper D. KEY WORDS: Retreatment, Mtwo-R, R-Endo, Protaper-D, Bioceramic sealer. RUNNING TITLE: Efficacy of different retreatment files in endodontic retreatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aly, A., Abdallah, A., & El Backly, R. (2020). EFFICACY OF THREE DIFFERENT RETREATMENT FILE SYSTEMS FOR GUTTA-PERCHA REMOVAL USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Alexandria Dental Journal, 0(0), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2020.122738

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free