Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-3L in a general population sample of adults

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: EQ-5D has separate three-level versions for children/adolescents (EQ-5D-Y-3L) and adults (EQ-5D-3L), assessing the same five dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using age-appropriate language. Little is known about how differences in wording affect self-reported HRQoL assessments. This study aimed to compare the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-3L in an adult general population sample. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a Hungarian adult general population sample representative by age and gender (n = 1,196). Measurement properties, including ceiling, floor, informativity, agreement (Kendall’s tau) and known-groups validity (effect sizes) based on self-perceived health and chronic conditions were compared across instruments. Results: EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-3L yielded 85 and 47 unique health states, respectively. Identical health profiles were reported by 59.0%. Overall ceiling was lower using the EQ-5D-Y-3L (34.8%) than the EQ-5D-3L (46.8%), with the largest dimension-level difference for EQ-5D-Y-3L worried/sad/unhappy (56.8%) vs. EQ-5D-3L anxiety/depression (71.6%). Relative informativity was higher for all EQ-5D-Y-3L dimensions (0.20–0.75) than EQ-5D-3L (0.18–0.66). Agreement was the weakest for worried/sad/unhappy vs. anxiety/depression (0.636) and the strongest for mobility (0.841). Both instruments showed medium to large effect sizes across known-groups based on level sum scores (EQ-5D-Y-3L: 0.820–2.454; EQ-5D-3L: 0.820–2.696) and index values (EQ-5D-Y-3L: 0.754–2.362; EQ-5D-3L: 0.747–2.365), with EQ-5D-Y-3L showing higher discriminatory power in 62–69% of known groups. Conclusion: Notable differences emerged between EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-3L in an adult general population sample, especially in the mental health dimension, suggesting that transitions between these instruments should be treated cautiously. The EQ-5D-Y-3L may offer advantages in detecting variations in mental health, even in adult populations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nikl, A., Brodszky, V., Szabó, Á., & Rencz, F. (2025). Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-3L in a general population sample of adults. European Journal of Health Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01839-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free