Estimation of the standardized risk difference and ratio in a competing risks framework: Application to injection drug use and progression to AIDS after initiation of antiretroviral therapy

48Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There are few published examples of absolute risk estimated from epidemiologic data subject to censoring and competing risks with adjustment for multiple confounders.We present an example estimating the effect of injection drug use on 6-year risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) after initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy between 1998 and 2012 in an 8-site US cohort study with death before AIDS as a competing risk. We estimate the risk standardized to the total study sample by combining inverse probability weights with the cumulative incidence function; estimates of precision are obtained by bootstrap. In 7,182 patients (83% male, 33% African American, median age of 38 years), we observed 6-year standardized AIDS risks of 16.75% among 1,143 injection drug users and 12.08% among 6,039 nonusers, yielding a standardized risk difference of 4.68 (95% confidence interval: 1.27, 8.08) and a standardized risk ratio of 1.39 (95% confidence interval: 1.12, 1.72). Results may be sensitive to the assumptions of exposure-version irrelevance, no measurement bias, and no unmeasured confounding. These limitations suggest that results be replicated with refined measurements of injection drug use. Nevertheless, estimating the standardized risk difference and ratio is straightforward, and injection drug use appears to increase the risk of AIDS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cole, S. R., Lau, B., Eron, J. J., Brookhart, M. A., Kitahata, M. M., Martin, J. N., … Mugavero, M. J. (2015). Estimation of the standardized risk difference and ratio in a competing risks framework: Application to injection drug use and progression to AIDS after initiation of antiretroviral therapy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 181(4), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free