Too-systemic-to-fail: What option markets imply about sector-wide government guarantees

116Citations
Citations of this article
196Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We examine the pricing of financial crash insurance during the 2007- 2009 financial crisis in US option markets, and we show that a large amount of aggregate tail risk is missing from the cost of financial sector crash insurance during the crisis. The difference in costs between out-of-the-money put options for individual banks and puts on the financial sector index increases four-fold from its precrisis 2003-2007 level. We provide evidence that a collective government guarantee for the financial sector lowers index put prices far more than those of individual banks and explains the increase in the basket- index put spread.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, B., Lustig, H., & Van Nieuwerburgh, S. (2016). Too-systemic-to-fail: What option markets imply about sector-wide government guarantees. American Economic Review, 106(6), 1278–1319. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120389

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free