Abstract
Tree height is a key variable in forest monitoring studies and for forest management. However, tree height measurement is time consuming, and the recommended procedure is to use estimates from height-diameter models. Here, we compare height-diameter model forms and approaches for predicting tree height (h) as a function of tree diameter at breast height (d) and additional stand level covariates. Four model forms were evaluated: (i) basic models (which only used d as predictor variable); (ii) generalized models (which used d and stand-level predictor variables); (iii) a mixed-effects model based on the best basic model; and (iv) a mixed-effects model based on the best generalized model. Several alternatives aimed at minimizing height measurement effort were tested in terms of accuracy and applicability. From a practical point of view, the selected generalized model is recommended for estimating the height of maritime pine in Portugal. The results also show that a calibrated basic mixed model provides more accurate results than a basic model locally fitted when the number of h-d observations is limited.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gómez-García, E., Fonseca, T. F., Crecente-Campo, F., Almeida, L. R., Diéguez-Aranda, U., Huang, S., & Marques, C. P. (2016). Height-diameter models for maritime pine in portugal: A comparison of basic, generalized and mixed-effects models. IForest, 9(Feb 2016), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1520-008
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.