Regulating the Way to Obesity: Unintended Consequences of Limiting Sugary Drink Sizes

21Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives:We examined whether a sugary drink limit would still be effective if larger-sized drinks were converted into bundles of smaller-sized drinks.Methods:In a behavioral simulation, participants were offered varying food and drink menus. One menu offered 16 oz, 24 oz, or 32 oz drinks for sale. A second menu offered 16 oz drinks, a bundle of two 12 oz drinks, or a bundle of two 16 oz drinks. A third menu offered only 16 oz drinks for sale. The method involved repeated elicitation of choices, and the instructions did not mention a limit on drink size.Results:Participants bought significantly more ounces of soda with bundles than with varying-sized drinks. Total business revenue was also higher when bundles rather than only small-sized drinks were sold.Conclusions:Our research suggests that businesses have a strong incentive to offer bundles of soda when drink size is limited. Restricting larger-sized drinks may have the unintended consequence of increasing soda consumption rather than decreasing it. © 2013 Wilson et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, B. M., Stolarz-Fantino, S., & Fantino, E. (2013). Regulating the Way to Obesity: Unintended Consequences of Limiting Sugary Drink Sizes. PLoS ONE, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061081

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free