5-HT does not lower blood pressure in the 5-HT7 knockout rat

20Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The fall in mean arterial pressure (MAP) after 24 h of 5-HT infusion is associated with a dilation of the portal vein (PV) and abdominal inferior vena cava (Ab IVC); all events were blocked by the selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist SB269970. Few studies have investigated the contribution of the 5-HT7 receptor in long-term cardiovascular control, and this requires an understanding of the chronic activation of the receptor. Using the newly created 5-HT7 receptor knockout (KO) rat, we presently test the hypothesis that continuous activation of the 5-HT7 receptor by 5-HT is necessary for the chronic (1 wk) depressor response and splanchnic venodilation. We also address if the 5-HT7 receptor contributes to endogenous cardiovascular regulation. Conscious MAP (radiotelemeter), splanchnic vessel diameter (ultrasound), and cardiac function (echocardiogram) were measured in ambulatory rats during multiday 5-HT infusion (25 μg·kg-1·min-1 via minipump) and after pump removal. 5-HT infusion reduced MAP and caused splanchnic venodilation of wild-type (WT) but not KO rats at any time point. The efficacy of 5-HT-induced contraction was elevated in the isolated abdominal inferior vena cava from the KO compared with WT rats, supporting loss of a relaxant receptor. Similarly, the efficacy of 5-HT causing an acute pressor response to higher doses of 5-HT in vivo was also increased in the KO vs. WT rat. Our work supports a novel mechanism for the cardiovascular effects of 5-HT, activation of 5-HT7 receptors mediating venodilation in the splanchnic circulation, which could prove useful in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seitz, B. M., Demireva, E. Y., Xie, H., Fink, G. D., Krieger-Burke, T., Burke, W. M., & Watts, S. W. (2019). 5-HT does not lower blood pressure in the 5-HT7 knockout rat. Physiological Genomics, 51(7), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00031.2019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free