Tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at clinical laboratory: Can they help to characterize staphylococcus aureus carrying different SCCmec types?

9Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be difficult to detect at the clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed 140 MRSA isolates from inpatients to correlate the antimicrobial susceptibility with the SCCmec types. Results: Type III (n = 63) isolates were more resistant to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, cloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamicin, and rifampin than type IV (n = 65) ones (p > 0.05). Moreover, type IV isolates were susceptible to tetracycline (100%) and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (98%), while type III isolates presented resistance to them. Conclusions: In regions where these SCCmec types are prevalent, the detection of specific resistant phenotypes could help to predict them, mainly when there are no technical conditions to SCCmec typing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sampaio Cavalcante, F., Pinto Schuenck, R., Ferreira Caboclo, R. M., Ferreira, D. de C., Aranha Nouér, S., & dos Santos, K. R. N. (2013). Tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at clinical laboratory: Can they help to characterize staphylococcus aureus carrying different SCCmec types? Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 46(1), 100–102. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-868216062013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free