Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be difficult to detect at the clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed 140 MRSA isolates from inpatients to correlate the antimicrobial susceptibility with the SCCmec types. Results: Type III (n = 63) isolates were more resistant to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, cloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamicin, and rifampin than type IV (n = 65) ones (p > 0.05). Moreover, type IV isolates were susceptible to tetracycline (100%) and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (98%), while type III isolates presented resistance to them. Conclusions: In regions where these SCCmec types are prevalent, the detection of specific resistant phenotypes could help to predict them, mainly when there are no technical conditions to SCCmec typing.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sampaio Cavalcante, F., Pinto Schuenck, R., Ferreira Caboclo, R. M., Ferreira, D. de C., Aranha Nouér, S., & dos Santos, K. R. N. (2013). Tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at clinical laboratory: Can they help to characterize staphylococcus aureus carrying different SCCmec types? Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 46(1), 100–102. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-868216062013
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.