Duration of epileptic seizure types: A data-driven approach

36Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the duration of epileptic seizure types in patients who did not undergo withdrawal of antiseizure medication. Methods: From a large, structured database of 11 919 consecutive, routine video-electroencephalograpy (EEG) recordings, labeled using the SCORE (Standardized Computer-Based Organized Reporting of EEG) system, we extracted and analyzed 2742 seizures. For each seizure type we determined median duration and range after removal of outliers (2.5–97.5 percentile). We used surface electromyography (EMG) for accurate measurement of short motor seizures. Results: Myoclonic seizures last <150 ms, epileptic spasms 0.4–2 s, tonic seizures 1.5–36 s, atonic seizures 0.1–12,5 s, when measured using surface EMG. Generalized clonic seizures last 1–24 s. Typical absence seizures are rarely longer than 30 s (2.75–26.5 s) and atypical absences last 2–100 s. In our patients, the duration of focal aware (median: 27 s; 1.25–166 s) and impaired awareness seizures (median: 42.5 s; 9.5–271 s) was shorter than reported previously in patients undergoing withdrawal of antiseizure medication. All focal seizures terminated within 10 min. Median duration of generalized tonic–clonic seizures was 79.5 s (57–102 s) and of focal-to-bilateral tonic–clonic seizures was 103.5 (77.5–237 s). All tonic–clonic seizures terminated within 5 min. Significance: This comprehensive list of seizure durations provides important information for characterizing seizures and diagnosing patients with epilepsy. The upper limits of seizure durations are helpful in early recognition of imminent status epilepticus.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meritam Larsen, P., Wüstenhagen, S., Terney, D., Gardella, E., Aurlien, H., & Beniczky, S. (2023). Duration of epileptic seizure types: A data-driven approach. Epilepsia, 64(2), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17492

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free