Megaesophagus microbiota and carcinogenesis

18Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background - The risk of development of spin cell carcinoma of the esophagus is 33 times higher in patients with chagasic achalasia. It is possible that the production of N-nitroso compounds in the esophageal lumen by of bacterial action in the stasis liquid that reduce nitrates from diet into nitrites may play a role in this process. Aim - To analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the microbiota in chagasic megaesophagus with special attention to bacteria capable of transforming nitto reduction. Patients - Fifteen patients (six men and nine women) were prospectively studied, with ages varying from 28 to 73 years. Patients were divided into three sub-groups according to Rezende et al. classification of esophageal dilation (grade I, grade II and grade III). Method - The sample collection was performed using a method specially developed to avoid contamination with microorganisms of the oral cavity and oropharynx, using a Levine catheter n° 14 and a 7,5 oro-traqueal tube. Results - Ninety three point three percent of the cultures were positive, with great bacterial variability and predominance of a variety of aerobic Gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria. The bacterial concentrations were generally more elevated in grade III in comparison to grade I and grade II. Among the microorganisms found, Staphylococcus sp, Corynebacterium sp, Peptostreptococcus sp e a Veillonella sp were those with the capability of nitrate reduction. Conclusion - It was concluded that patients with megaesophagus present some bacteria in the esophageal lumen that are able to reduce nitrates intro nitrites, an important step in the formation of N-nitroso compounds.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pajecki, D., Zilberstein, B., Azevedo Dos Santos, M. A., Guimarães Quintanilha, A., Cecconello, I., & Gama-Rodrigues, J. (2003). Megaesophagus microbiota and carcinogenesis. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 40(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032003000100004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free