Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review

6Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare systems are increasingly implementing programs for high-need patients, who often have multiple chronic conditions and complex social situations. Little, however, is known about quality indicators that might guide healthcare organizations and providers in improving care for high-need patients. We sought to conduct a systematic review to identify potential quality indicators for high-need patients. Methods: This systematic review (CRD42020215917) searched PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE; guideline clearing houses ECRI and GIN; and Google scholar. We included publications suggesting, evaluating, and utilizing indicators to assess quality of care for high-need patients. Critical appraisal of the indicators addressed the development process, endorsement and adoption, and characteristics, such as feasibility. We standardized indicators by patient population subgroups to facilitate comparisons across different indicator groups. Results: The search identified 6964 citations. Of these, 1382 publications were obtained as full text, and 53 studies met inclusion criteria. We identified over 1700 quality indicators across studies. Quality indicator characteristics varied widely. The scope of the selected indicators ranged from detailed criterion (e.g., “annual eye exam”) to very broad categories (e.g., “care coordination”). Some publications suggested disease condition–specific indicators (e.g., diabetes), some used condition-independent criteria (e.g., “documentation of the medication list in the medical record available to all care agencies”), and some publications used a mixture of indicator types. Discussion: We identified and evaluated existing quality indicators for a complex, heterogeneous patient group. Although some quality indicators were not disease-specific, we found very few that accounted for social determinants of health and behavioral factors. More research is needed to develop quality indicators that address patient risk factors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schneberk, T., Bolshakova, M., Sloan, K., Chang, E., Stal, J., Dinalo, J., … Hempel, S. (2022, September 1). Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review. Journal of General Internal Medicine. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07454-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free