Could, would, should: Theory of mind and deontic reasoning in Tongan children

6Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study examined the developmental profiles of children's social reasoning about individual agentive and deontic concerns. Tongan children (N = 140, 47.9% male), aged 4–8 years, were given a set of mentalistic (standard theory-of-mind) and deontic reasoning tasks. On average, children found diverse desires, knowledge access, hidden emotion, and belief emotion easier than the false-belief and diverse belief tasks. Tongan children were sensitive to social norms governing behavior, and this information was recruited for predicting behavior in a false-belief task when embedded in a socially normative context. We discuss the potential for cultural mandates to shape children's social understanding and the impact of culture on our theoretical framing of children's development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taumoepeau, M., Kata, U. F., Veikune, A. H., Lotulelei, S., Vea, P. T., & Fonua, I. (2022). Could, would, should: Theory of mind and deontic reasoning in Tongan children. Child Development, 93(5), 1511–1526. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13797

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free