Precarisation of dentistry in private healthcare: Bioethical analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The present study highlighted the labour process of the dental surgeon (DS) in the private healthcare sector from the healthcare professional’s perspective based on intervention bioethics. An observational, cross-sectional survey study was performed within the Federal District (Distrito Federal) region. Data were collected from 108 questionnaires completed by DSs affiliated with two types of private health insurers, self-insurance and group insurance, to assess job perception and the degree of job satisfaction in the dentistry market. The main source of dissatisfaction for healthcare professionals was related to the pay for dental procedures by insurers. For self-insurer 1, 38.1% healthcare professionals replied that the pay was satisfactory, whereas in self-insurance 2 and in the group insurance, 100% of healthcare professionals were dissatisfied. Another finding was that the group insurer considerably restricted elective treatments. In conclusion, loss of professional autonomy, depreciation of insurance claims and precarisation of dentistry occurs in the private healthcare sector, thus demonstrating the ethical conflicts in this relationship.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Moraes, D. A., Maluf, F., Tauil, P. L., & Portillo, J. A. C. (2019). Precarisation of dentistry in private healthcare: Bioethical analysis. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 24(3), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018243.01972017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free