What's wrong with Hebrew nlp? And how to make it right

17Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For languages with simple morphology, such as English, automatic annotation pipelines such as spaCy or Stanford's CoreNLP successfully serve AI/DS projects in academia and the industry. For many morphologically-rich languages (MRLs), similar pipelines show suboptimal performance that limits their applicability for text analysis in research and commerical use. The suboptimal performance is mainly due to errors in early morphological disambiguation decisions, which cannot be recovered later in the pipeline, yielding incoherent annotations on the whole. In this paper we describe the design and use of the ONLP suite, a joint morpho-syntactic parsing framework for processing Modern Hebrew texts. The joint inference over morphology and syntax substantially limits error propagation, and leads to high accuracy. ONLP provides rich and expressive output which already serves diverse academic and commercial needs. Its accompanying demo further serves educational activities, introducing Hebrew NLP intricacies to researchers and non-researchers alike.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsarfaty, R., Seker, A., Sadde, S., & Klein, S. (2019). What’s wrong with Hebrew nlp? And how to make it right. In EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019 - 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of System Demonstrations (pp. 259–264). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-3044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free