Conceiving God: Literal and Figurative Prompt for a More Tectonic Distinction

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

John Sanders' Theology in the Flesh, the first comprehensive overview of the toolkit that contemporary cognitive linguistics offers for theological appropriation, despite its remarkable success, gives rather minimal attention to blending theory, one of the discipline's most formidable tools. This paper draws on blending theory to offer an alternative to Sanders' chapter on conceiving God. Central to the proposal is claim that God-talk, like many of the advances in science, technology, and art, entails a kind of tectonic understanding and conceptual mapping that is neither literal nor figurative.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Masson, R. (2018). Conceiving God: Literal and Figurative Prompt for a More Tectonic Distinction. Open Theology, 4(1), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free