Abstract
This study evaluated the agreement of fiducial marker localization between two modalities - an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - using a low-dose, half-rotation scanning protocol. Twenty-five prostate cancer patients with implanted fiducial markers were enrolled. Before each daily treatment, EPID and half-rotation CBCT images were acquired. Translational shifts were computed for each modality and two marker-matching algorithms, seed-chamfer and grey-value, were performed for each set of CBCT images. The localization offsets, and systematic and random errors from both modalities were computed. Localization performances for both modalities were compared using Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) analysis, Deming regression analysis, and Cohen's kappa inter-rater analysis. The differences in the systematic and random errors between the modalities were within 0.2 mm in all directions. The LoA analysis revealed a 95% agreement limit of the modalities of 2 to 3.5 mm in any given translational direction. Deming regression analysis demonstrated that constant biases existed in the shifts computed by the modalities in the superior-inferior (SI) direction, but no significant proportional biases were identified in any direction. Cohen's kappa analysis showed good agreement between the modalities in prescribing translational corrections of the couch at 3 and 5 mm action levels. Images obtained from EPID and half-rotation CBCT showed acceptable agreement for registration of fiducial markers. The seed-chamfer algorithm for tracking of fiducial markers in CBCT datasets yielded better agreement than the grey-value matching algorithm with EPID-based registration.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ung, N. M., Wee, L., Hackett, S. L., Jones, A., Lim, T. S., & Harper, C. S. (2013). Comparison of low-dose, half-rotation, cone-beam ct with electronic portal imaging device for registration of fiducial markers during prostate radiotherapy. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 14(4), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4249
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.