Saline for peripheral intravenous locks in neonates: evaluating a change in practice.

12Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of saline versus 10 units/ml heparin for peripheral i.v. flushes in neonates. DESIGN: A nonexperimental group design was used to compare the longevity of heparin and saline i.v. locks. A research utilization method was chosen to increase the study power while simultaneously implementing a practice change and evaluating the outcomes. Power analysis showed that a sample size of approximately 120 per group was needed to decrease the risk of beta error to 0.1. SAMPLE: Subjects included neonates in the Special Care Nurseries at a Level III large midwestern university teaching hospital. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 123 neonates receiving 10 units/ml heparin flush into a peripheral i.v. Practice was then changed to preservative-free normal saline, and data collection continued for 117 neonates. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: I.v. catheter longevity. RESULTS: There was no significant statistical difference in i.v. catheter longevity between i.v. locks flushed with 10 units/ml heparin and those flushed with normal saline. Patient weight accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in i.v. catheter life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hanrahan, K. S., Kleiber, C., & Berends, S. (2000). Saline for peripheral intravenous locks in neonates: evaluating a change in practice. Neonatal Network : NN, 19(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1891/0730-0832.19.2.19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free