Longer-term outcomes of nutritional management of Crohn's disease in children

49Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background While the short-term benefits of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) for induction of remission in children with Crohn's disease (CD) are well documented, the longer-term outcomes are less clear. Aim This retrospective study aimed to ascertain the outcomes for up to 24 months following EEN in a group of children with CD. Methods Children treated with EEN as initial therapy for newly diagnosed CD over a 5-year period were identified. Details of disease activity, growth, and drug requirements over the period of follow-up were noted. Outcomes in children managed with EEN were compared to a group of children initially treated with corticosteroids. Results Over this time period, 31 children were treated with EEN and 26 with corticosteroids. Twenty-six (84 %) of the 31 children treated withEENentered remission. Children treated with EEN exhibited lower pediatric Crohn's disease activity index (PCDAI) scores at 6 months (p = 0.02) and received lower cumulative doses of steroids over the study period (p < 0.0001) than the group treated with corticosteroids. Height increments over 24 months were greater in the EEN group (p = 0.01). Although the median times to relapse were the same, the EEN group had a lower incidence of relapse in each time interval and survival curve analysis showed lower risk of relapse (p = 0.008). Conclusions EEN lead to multiple benefits beyond the initial period of inducing remission for these children, with positive outcomes over 2 years from diagnosis. Of particular clinical relevance to growing children was the reduced exposure to corticosteroids. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lambert, B., Lemberg, D. A., Leach, S. T., & Day, A. S. (2012). Longer-term outcomes of nutritional management of Crohn’s disease in children. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 57(8), 2171–2177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2232-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free