Is There Still a Place for Linearization in the Chemistry Curriculum?

12Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The use of mathematical transformations to reduce nonlinear functions to linear problems, which can be tackled with analytical linear regression, is commonplace in the chemistry curriculum. The linearization procedure, however, assumes an incorrect statistical model for real experimental data; leading to biased estimates of regression parameters and should therefore not be used in formal data analysis. This fact is overlooked in many chemistry degrees, as students do not yet have the mathematical knowledge to appreciate why linearization leads to bias when it is introduced. I hope that this commentary will start a discussion around the place of linearization in the chemistry curriculum, and more broadly around how mathematical and statistical training is currently provided to chemistry students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McCluskey, A. R. (2023, November 14). Is There Still a Place for Linearization in the Chemistry Curriculum? Journal of Chemical Education. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00466

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free