Shareholders’ perception of management communications in annual general meetings: Narrative or not?

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigates management communications in annual general meetings (AGMs) from a narrative perspective. This study evaluates the effective elements of AGMs from the shareholder’s viewpoint. According to the theoretical framework, the authors developed a conceptual model and extracted the suggested narrative model for the first time. The shareholder’s perception was measured through a questionnaire survey containing three sections – narrative, audience, and narrator – with 32 indicators from 151 shareholders measuring shareholders’ opinions about AGMs in Iran. The results indicate that although shareholders do not consider the AGM communications made by management board as a narrative, they obtain relevant information with a logical flow in AGMs, and believe that these relations are useful. The characteristics of the management board impact on the persuasiveness of their communications. The results supported the mediating effect of AGM communication between managers and shareholders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oskouei, M. M., Nikoomaram, H., & Roodposhti, F. R. (2020). Shareholders’ perception of management communications in annual general meetings: Narrative or not? Argumenta Oeconomica, 2020(2), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2020.2.04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free