Responsibility of the Netherlands for the Acts of Dutchbat in Nuhanović and Mustafić: The continuous quest for a tangible meaning for 'effective control' in the context of peacekeeping

19Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In Nuhanović and Mustafić (5 July 2011), the Court of Appeal of The Hague held the Netherlands liable under Bosnian torts law in relation to acts of Dutchbat in the days following the fall of Srebrenica. The claims were brought by relatives of victims killed by Mladić's troops after being evicted from the Dutchbat premises, where they had sought refuge. When resorting to international law to attribute the conduct to the Netherlands, the Court shed light on the concrete meaning of 'effective control' when a wrongful conduct does not result from direct orders, thereby clarifying some of the questions surrounding the determination of responsibility for conducts in the framework of international organizations. © 2012 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boutin, B. (2012). Responsibility of the Netherlands for the Acts of Dutchbat in Nuhanović and Mustafić: The continuous quest for a tangible meaning for “effective control” in the context of peacekeeping. Leiden Journal of International Law, 25(2), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156512000192

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free