Abstract
In Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 data, we used a 3-stage approach to explore the benefits of pathway analysis in improving a model to predict 2 diastolic blood pressure phenotypes as a function of genetic variation. At stage 1, gene-based tests of association in family data of approximately 800 individuals found over 600 genes associated at p<0.05 for each phenotype. At stage 2, networks and enriched pathways were estimated with Cytoscape for genes from stage 1, separately for the 2 phenotypes, then examining network overlap. This overlap identified 4 enriched pathways, and 3 of these pathways appear to interact, and are likely candidates for playing a role in hypertension. At stage 3, using 157 maximally unrelated individuals, partial least squares regression was used to find associations between diastolic blood pressure and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes highlighted by the pathway analyses. However, we saw no improvement in the adjusted cross-validated R 2. Although our pathway-motivated regressions did not improve prediction of diastolic blood pressure, merging gene networks did identify several plausible pathways for hypertension.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dufresne, L., Oualkacha, K., Forgetta, V., & Greenwood, C. M. (2014). Pathway analysis for genetic association studies: To do, or not to do? That is the question. In BMC Proceedings (Vol. 8). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S1-S103
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.