Psychiatric training revisited - Better, worse or the same?

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims and method: To evaluate psychiatric training in one deanery following a programme of site visits, interviews with trainers and trainees, reports, and recommendations. To assess the findings in the context of NHS training requirements. Information was collected by semi-structured interviews and questionnaire surveys. Results: Forty-three sites were visited, training is generally of a high standard and most trainees are satisfied with their posts. There are significant problems in delivering sufficient community experience to general practice trainees and deficits in availability of multi-professional training programmes. Clinical implications: College tutors should work to ensure that trainees have access to shared learning occasions with non-medical health professionals to meet the NHS training agenda.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herzberg, J., & Paice, E. (2002). Psychiatric training revisited - Better, worse or the same? Psychiatric Bulletin, 26(4), 132–134. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.26.4.132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free