It takes one to know one—Machine learning for identifying OBGYN abstracts written by ChatGPT

6Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To use machine learning to optimize the detection of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) -written abstracts of all OBGYN journals. Methods: We used Web of Science to identify all original articles published in all OBGYN journals in 2022. Seventy-five original articles were randomly selected. For each, we prompted ChatGPT to write an abstract based on the title and results of the original abstracts. Each abstract was tested by Grammarly software and reports were inserted into a database. Machine-learning modes were trained and examined on the database created. Results: Overall, 75 abstracts from 12 different OBGYN journals were randomly selected. There were seven (58%) Q1 journals, one (8%) Q2 journal, two (17%) Q3 journals, and two (17%) Q4 journals. Use of mixed dialects of English, absence of comma-misuse, absence of incorrect verb forms, and improper formatting were important prediction variables of ChatGPT-written abstracts. The deep-learning model had the highest predictive performance of all examined models. This model achieved the following performance: accuracy 0.90, precision 0.92, recall 0.85, area under the curve 0.95. Conclusions: Machine-learning-based tools reach high accuracy in identifying ChatGPT-written OBGYN abstracts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levin, G., Meyer, R., Guigue, P. A., & Brezinov, Y. (2024). It takes one to know one—Machine learning for identifying OBGYN abstracts written by ChatGPT. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 165(3), 1257–1260. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15365

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free