Leisure planning process: systematic adhocracy

Abstract

Research Question: Guided by literature, a leisure planning typology was developed with four phases to identify how ARCs were planned. The typology guided the deductive analysis to address our research question, How is a leisure planning process applied in ARC planning? Methodology: A qualitative multiple-case study design was applied. Data from document analysis (n = 264) and semi-structured interviews (n = 19) were deductively analyzed based on a leisure planning typology. Findings: A lack of adherence to specific planning models was evident. Instead, an ad hoc planning approach was applied, where planners relied on data collected to assist how an ARC should be planned. The characteristics associated with ad hoc planning led to this approach termed “systemic adhocracy”. Practical implications: Planning, guided by a structured framework is crucial for maximising community benefits and addressing needs. Our study provides insight to the ARC planning process and the opportunity to apply the leisure planning typology to guide future investments, optimise planning, and enhance community outcomes.