Association between obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and adverse obstetric outcomes

20Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Research question: How does the presence of obesity modify the risks for adverse obstetric outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? Design: Retrospective population-based cohort study using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2004–2014. A total of 14,855 women with PCOS were identified (study group: obese women with PCOS [BMI ≥30 kg/m2] [n = 3286]; reference group: remaining women with PCOS [n =11 569]). Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the associations between obesity, pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes. Results: Obesity was associated with a higher prevalence of chronic hypertension (P < 0.001), pregestational diabetes (P < 0.001) and a previous caesarean delivery (P < 0.001). Obesity increased the risk of gestational diabetes (adjusted [a]OR 1.745; 95% CI 1.473 to 2.067), pregnancy-induced hypertension (aOR1.889; 95% CI 1.589 to 2.246), gestational hypertension (aOR 1.555; 95% CI 1.219 to 1.983) and preeclampsia (aOR 2.170; 95% CI 1.683 to 2.798). Maternal obesity in PCOS increased the risk of chorioamnionitis (aOR 1.548; 95% CI 1.072 to 2.235) and caesarean delivery (aOR 1.414; 95% CI 1.210 to 1.653) and decreased the likelihood of a spontaneous vaginal delivery (aOR 0.751; 95% CI 0.644 to 0.876). Infants born to obese mothers with PCOS were not more likely to be SGA (aOR 0.775; 95% CI 0.511 to 1.175) or to have congenital anomalies (aOR 0.849; 95% CI 0.483 to 1.490). Conclusion: In women with PCOS, obesity increases the risk of specific pregnancy and delivery complications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peeva, M., Badeghiesh, A., Baghlaf, H., & Dahan, M. H. (2022). Association between obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and adverse obstetric outcomes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 45(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free