Analysis of the best therapeutic alternative for intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The material for this research consisted of 93 patients with dural arteriovenous malformations (DAVMs) who were studied retrospectively with regards to therapeutic success and failure, who had undergone either neurosurgery, or embolization or a combination of both methods and whose disease was located in the cavernous sinus, the superior sagittal sinus, the transverse-sigmoid sinus of the anterior fossa and the tentorium. Thus, it was possible to arrive at the following conclusions: treatment of the DAVMs must be indicated, jointly, by an interventionist neuroradiologist and a neurosurgeon; DAVMs of the transverse-sigmoid sinus were better treated when a combination of both methods was used; DAVMs of the tentorium were also better treated with a combined method; the endovascular method ensured only a 50% chance of therapeutic success for DAVMs of the superior sagittal sinus; DAVMs of the cavernous sinus are better treated when the endovascular method was used with a transvenous approach, relative to the transarterial approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Paula Lucas, C., Prandini, M. N., & Pereira Caldas, J. G. M. (2005). Analysis of the best therapeutic alternative for intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 63(3 A), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2005000400010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free