Comparison of the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Bevacizumab Combined with Chemotherapy in Advanced Driver Gene-Negative Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced driver gene-negative non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 199 patients treated from October 2015 to January 2022. Group A (n=103) received ICIs plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed + cisplatin), while Group B (n=96) received bevacizumab plus the same chemotherapy. Outcomes included treatment response, serum tumor markers (CEA, CA-125, CA-199), immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM), adverse reactions, and survival [progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)]. Results: Group A had a significantly higher objective response rate (59.22% vs 36.46%, P=0.001). Tumor marker levels decreased more in Group A (P<0.05), while declines in immunoglobulin levels were less pronounced (P<0.05). Adverse events were similar between groups (P>0.05). Group A had a longer median PFS (11.13 vs 7.37 months, P<0.05), and a non-significant trend toward longer OS (20.87 vs 18.4 months, P=0.159). Conclusion: ICIs combined with chemotherapy improved treatment efficacy and PFS compared to bevacizumab-based therapy in advanced driver gene-negative NS-NSCLC, with manageable safety and less impact on immune function.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, W., Dai, Q., Ye, Z., & Huang, Y. (2025). Comparison of the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Bevacizumab Combined with Chemotherapy in Advanced Driver Gene-Negative Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 18, 4279–4289. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S535853

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free