Reply to Comment on “Surrealistic Bohm Trajectories”

Abstract

Let us begin with a response to the summary of the Comment by D. Dürr, W. Fusseder, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi [1]. We are accused to not stay inside “orthodox quantum theory” but to employ a “naive, largely incoherent operationalism” instead. We think that this charge is not justified, because we did apply standard quantum theory correctly and also followed the rules of Bohmian Mechanics (BM) carefully. In the following we react to the more essential points of the Comment in some detail. © 1993, Walter de Gruyter. All rights reserved.