Dynamic collaborative optimization for disaster relief supply chains under information ambiguity

16Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Large-scale disasters occur worldwide, with a continuing surge in the frequency and severity of disruptive events. Researchers have developed several optimization models to address the critical challenges of disaster relief supply chains (e.g., emergency material reserving and scheduling inefficiencies). However, most developed algorithms are proven to have low fault tolerance, which makes it difficult for disaster relief supply chain managers to obtain optimal solutions and meet the emergency distribution requirements within a limited time frame. Considering the uncertainty and ambiguity of disaster relief information and using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set (IT2TFS), this paper presents a collaborative optimization model based on an integrative emergency material supplier evaluation framework. The optimal emergency material suppliers are first selected using a multi-attribute group decision-making ranking method. Multi-objective fuzzy optimization is then run in three emergency phases: early -, mid-, and late-disaster relief stages. Focusing on a massive flash flood disaster event in Yunnan Province as a case study, a comprehensive numerical analysis tests and validates the developed model. The results revealed that the proposed optimization method can optimize emergency material planning while ensuring that reserve material safety inventory is always maintained at a reasonable level. The presented method suggests a fuzzy interval to prevent emergency materials’ safety inventory shortage and minimize continuous life/property losses in disaster-affected areas.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, J., Shi, Y., Venkatesh, V. G., Islam, S., Hou, Z., & Arisian, S. (2024). Dynamic collaborative optimization for disaster relief supply chains under information ambiguity. Annals of Operations Research, 335(3), 1303–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04758-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free