Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrafiltration (UF) in patients admitted with decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Ultrafiltration for CHF is usually reserved for patients with renal failure or those unresponsive to pharmacologic management. We performed a randomized trial of UF versus usual medical care using a simple UF device that does not require special monitoring or central intravenous access. METHODS: Patients admitted for CHF with evidence of volume overload were randomized to a single, 8 h UF session in addition to usual care or usual care alone. The primary end point was weight loss 24 h after the time of enrollment. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled (20 UF, 20 usual care). Ultrafiltration was successful in 18 of the 20 patients in the UF group. Fluid removal after 24 h was 4,650 ml and 2,838 ml in the UF and usual care groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Weight loss after 24 h, the primary end point, was 2.5 kg and 1.86 kg in the UF and usual care groups, respectively (p = 0.240). Patients tolerated UF well. CONCLUSIONS: The early application of UF for patients with CHF was feasible, well-tolerated, and resulted in significant weight loss and fluid removal. A larger trial is underway to determine the relative efficacy of UF versus standard care in acute decompensated heart failure. © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bart, B. A., Boyle, A., Bank, A. J., Anand, I., Olivari, M. T., Kraemer, M., … Goldsmith, S. R. (2005). Ultrafiltration versus usual care for hospitalized patients with heart failure: The relief for acutely fluid-overloaded patients with decompensated congestive heart failure (RAPID-CHF) trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 46(11), 2043–2046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.098
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.